Summary
Summary of Major Challenges and Recommendations
The Self-Study recognizes a number of challenges that merit
institutional focus and action. These challenges have been clustered in the
chart below according to five topics:
- Budget—understanding of and participation in
planning and allocating financial resources
- Diversity—valuing human differences in race,
ethnicity, religion, learning styles, etc.
- Environment—creating conditions for all University members
to excel
- Alignment—perceptions of synergy or compatibility
among mission, priorities, structures, activities, resources, and rewards
- Assessment for Improving Learning— evaluations of
activities and programs for improvement and accountability.
Challenges are followed by brief recommendations made
earlier in the report. While many challenges might fit in more than one of the
five major topics, each challenge and recommendation emphasized in the
Self-Study is located below in only one topical category. The challenges and
recommendations are not listed in order of priority.
Budget
|
Challenges |
Recommendations |
|
Technology budget (beyond Student
Computer-Usage Fee) |
Increase budget for technologies
beyond
student computer-usage fee |
|
Increased external funding to
offset
decreasing state funding |
Increase emphasis on fundraising
from external sources, including grant-proposal writing |
|
Graduate-program funding |
Continue to enhance graduate-program
funding |
|
Uneven understanding of and
involvement in strategic budget decisions by faculty and
department heads |
Implement more inclusive and
informative budget process |
|
Inadequate Faculty and Staff Salaries |
- Develop and
implement new faculty productivity standards and reward systems
- Review current compensation status
for classified staff
|
Diversity
|
Challenges |
Recommendations |
|
Within budget constraints,
increase enrollment of ethnic minorities and recruit and retain high-quality
faculty |
Continue to give high priority to
diversity in student recruitment and faculty hiring |
|
Elevate the role of Missouri State
University as a leader in state and regional diversity issues |
- Elevate equal-opportunity
and affirmative-action compliance to a greater appreciation of diversity by
increasing the visibility of positive experiences that diversity brings
- Increase
students’ active learning experiences with international students and other
diverse populations to make theoretical knowledge about diversity more
meaningful
- Continue to improve services and
programs for non-traditional students and students from diverse backgrounds
|
Environment
|
Challenges |
Recommendations |
|
Greater participation by members
of university community in planning process |
Encourage greater direct
participation in the opportunities that already exist |
|
Greater faculty participation in
professional development |
Achieve more widespread and
effective use of professional development opportunities |
|
Evaluating appropriate use of
Instructional Technology training |
Increase appropriate use of
Instructional Technology |
|
Facilities renovation and/or expansion |
Upgrade facilities and streamline
work-order process for physical plant changes to improve learning environment |
|
Mentoring of new faculty |
Continue to expand the mentoring
program |
|
Communication channels (laterally
and vertically) are not always used properly to inform university community
about decisions and processes |
Improve communication at all
levels, including more widespread discussion of policy changes and implementation
of new programs and initiatives |
|
Diffuse administration of
international programs and relatively low percentage of students
participating |
Improve international programs and
emphasis on globalization, in part by establishing international-affairs
group to assist in communication and coordination of goals, strategies, and
programs |
|
Difficulty of creating and
implementing interdisciplinary studies programs and research projects |
Review and improve procedures for
interdisciplinary studies and research |
|
Current environmental scanning is
limited in scope and is diffuse. |
Improve coordination and broaden
use of systematic environmental scanning to monitor changing social and
economic conditions of state/region in order to better serve constituents |
|
Cumbersome curricular change and approval
process |
Evaluate curriculum change and
approval process to streamline while retaining quality assurance |
Alignment
|
Challenges |
Recommendations |
|
Inconsistent perceptions of the
University’s public affairs mission and its implementation |
- Continue
dialogues regarding the University’s public affairs mission, including orientation
of new members to the mission, and implementation of mission by individuals
and units
- Develop and implement new faculty
standards and reward systems related to the mission
|
|
Inequity across departments in new
classroom technology and streamlining of requests |
Provide equity and more organized
and timely process for requesting, ordering, and installing new classroom
technology |
|
Inequity within and across departments
for work with graduate studies |
Develop graduate program workload
recognition |
Assessment for Improved Learning
|
Challenges |
Recommendations |
|
Lack of formal campus-wide
academic review policy that supports long-range plan measures and incorporates
data-based decisions |
Implement a campus-wide academic review
policy that supports long-range plan measures and incorporates data-based decisions |
|
Inefficient sharing of alumni data
across offices to assess the success of graduates |
Continue work started to survey
and track graduates through a centrally-maintained database available for
query |
|
Inconsistent use of available
information to assess and improve student learning |
Request academic units to take
more responsibility for using assessment results to improve curriculum and
student learning experiences |
|
Current environmental scanning is
limited in scope and is diffuse |
Improve coordination and broaden use
of systematic environmental scanning to monitor changing social and economic
conditions of state/region in order to better serve constituents |
Comment on this section


HOME
Copyright 2000 Board of Governors, Missouri State University
URL: http://www.missouristate.edu
Maintained by Web Coordinator
Last Modified:
September 08, 2005
|
|