As part of an ongoing cycle of program review, Assessment is having its turn. External Reviewers Charles Blaich and Kathy Wise from the Center of Inquiry in the Liberal Arts will be on campus August 28-30, 2018. The mission of the Center is to support the efforts of faculty, staff, administrators, and students at 2- and 4-year institutions to use evidence to improve student learning through consultation, advice on designing assessment programs, surveys, site visits, program evaluation, workshops, and other mechanisms. In addition, Dr. Blaich and Ms. Wise have supported projects at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, National Survey of Student Engagement, and conduct the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education. The Office of Assessment, at the direction of the Provost, has asked reviewers to weigh in on the following items:
- The effectiveness and value of our week-long workshop in May. This assessment workshop has brought faculty, staff, and students together to assess student learning in public affairs and in general education.
- How are the split assessment functions working at Missouri State? Colleges and programs focus on program-level assessment while the Office of Assessment supports college- and university-level assessment.
- Provide feedback on our current assessment philosophy that there are multiple approaches to assessing student learning. The university embeds assessment of student learning within existing reports (department reports, accreditation reports, program review, general education reports, and Deans' annual reports to the Provost). How do we effectively frame this style and philosophy to accrediting bodies, such as HLC?
- We have been successful at administering the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement, National Survey of Student Engagement, and Faculty Survey of Student Engagement. We would like feedback on the BCSSE/NSSE data and how best to use evidence of student learning post-administration. As experts and as Directors of the Higher Education Data Sharing Consortium, what are the actionable items that can inform institutional assessment?
- Review the University Exit Exam and the ways in which that data is disseminated and used.
- We have questions regarding what we have been calling "data infrastructure." The University purchases Digital Measures and Blackboard. How can we use best use existing systems to answer the questions we have, especially in light of industry consolidation? Could we reduce the costs for students and get a better handle on our data?
- Is Student Affairs' approach to assessment optimal? Currently, the unit chooses one learning outcome a year and each program assesses that outcome at the program-level and reports to the Unit Assessment committee.
- What insights do you have regarding how institutions use evidence of student learning to support workforce development trends?
Our mid-cycle Higher Learning Commission report is due in early 2020. This program review takes place at the mid-point prior to this report and will be useful in keeping our momentum going.